date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:35:31 +0000
from: Tim Osborn <t.osbornatXYZxyz.ac.uk>
subject: Fwd: QSR 19 (2000) 87-105
to: Keith Briffa <k.briffaatXYZxyz.ac.uk>
looks like you might be the next focus of McIntyre!
I haven't replied yet, but when I get round to it I will simply say "don't
ask me, it's not my data or paper". After that, I guess he'll send the
request to you - unless he already has.
>From: "Steve McIntyre" <stephen.mcintyreatXYZxyzronto.ca>
>To: "Tim Osborn" <t.osbornatXYZxyz.ac.uk>
>Subject: QSR 19 (2000) 87-105
>Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:07:09 -0500
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
>In Keith Briffa's QSR 2000 article, his Figure 1f contains a version of
>the Yamal chronology which has a very different appearance than the Yamal
>chronology archived at WDCP by Hantemirov or published by Hantemirov et al
>in Holocene 2002. The QSR 2000 article refers to a Russian journal
>inaccessible to me and does not provide a citation for the data set in a
>public archive, sufficient to enable the downloading of this data. Have
>Hantemirov et al. archived the different data version that WDCP (and
>presumably used in QSR Fig 1f) in some other official archive than WDCP?
>Does the version archived by Hantemirov et al at WDCP supercede the
>version used by Briffa? If Hantemirov have archived the data, could you
>send me the URL? (I am aware of the Briffa URL for the QSR Figure 1, but
>that is obviously a secondary source.) If Hantemirov has not archived the
>data, I'd be interested in the source of the data.
>Thanks for your help.
>Regards, Steve McIntyre
Dr Timothy J Osborn
Climatic Research Unit
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia
Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK